Hysteria, by Will Stanton

I
delayed writing about this subject longer than I normally do about selected
topics because I was torn between writing about a painful truth regarding my
mother or resisting it and writing something fictional and entertaining, simply
as an antidote.  I finally decided to
stick to facts but to keep it as short as possible.
First,
you have to understand my mother’s background. 
Several terrible events combined to damage her emotionally.
First,
apparently, her own mother was very fond of her first-born daughter but did not
express much love or support for my mother. 
This only enhanced my mother’s deep attachment to her father, evidently
a very caring, loving man, who also was highly admired for his many skills and
successes.  He was a professor of physics
and chemistry, kept bees, took the family on long camping trips (which included
Colorado back when it had mostly dirt roads), collected Indian arrowheads, and
played classical violin.  Unfortunately,
he was exposed to radiation from his early lab experiments and died painfully
of cancer at age forty-eight.  My mother,
at the time, was at that critical age of fifteen and deeply suffered the loss
of her father.
Next,
her mother developed the strange notion that she needed to remarry but retain
the same surname.  Consequently, she
blindly married her late husband’s uncle, until then unmarried and a whole
generation older.  It turned out that
this man became the “stepfather from Hell.”
To
start with, he decided that the family must abandoned their beloved home (once
owned by Mary Todd Lincoln’s family) and move to his home-town.  My mother packed her few prized possessions
into a trunk in anticipation of the move. 
The stepfather, however, left the trunk behind, later stating that “there
wasn’t enough room to take it.”  My
mother was very hurt and never forgot the callous loss of her possessions.
Everything
went from bad to worse.  Very quickly, my
mother and grandmother discovered that this man had a violent temper and
frequently exploded into tirades of verbal and even physical abuse, hitting
them.  When the stepfather discovered
that my mother was saving a little money during summers working as a waitress
so she could go to college, he stole all her money to pay for ill-chosen stocks
that he had bought.  He lost all the
stocks and money in the Great Depression. 
This man chose not even to keep his disdain for the family private.  He frequently spoke ill of them to friends
and neighbors, telling terrible falsehoods about them.
It
wasn’t until many years later when I was in my forties did I hear hints from my
mother that this “stepfather from hell” had gone every morning into her
bedroom.  Apparently, my grandmother
never knew or was too afraid to do anything about it.  My comprehension of this trauma became
clarified by my father, who spoke to me shortly before his passing.  He stated that, for a while after he and my
mother were married, she would wake up every morning, screaming.  I was absolutely shocked.  In retrospect, I realized that this hysteria
had been expressed in many ways during my childhood.
Throughout
my childhood and adult life, I witnessed my mother’s deep-seated fear and
anxiety.  I realize that, no matter how
hard she struggled to do the right things with her life and her family, to take
on and excel in numerous activities, she continually was plagued by those fears
and anxieties.  She feared the world; she
feared people.  Many times, I heard her
bitterly declare, “I hate men; I just hate men.”  She feared anyone whom she did not
understand.  She feared blacks and
foreigners.  She feared and disliked
homosexuals.  Once, when I was watching a
documentary on Africa, she rushed over to the TV and turned it off, stating, “I
don’t want you to watch that.  All
white-hunters are homosexuals.”
As
another consequence, she tried to control all people and the world around
her.  Anyone or anything that she could
not control upset her.  Everything had to
be just the way she thought it should be, otherwise she would worry, sometimes
even panic, and become hysterical.
An
unfortunate, known psychological phenomenon is that one way traumatized people
attempt to cope is to adopt many of the same hurtful behaviors that had caused
them harm in the first place.  This was
true with her.  When I was young, she
once said that she hoped that she never would become like her stepfather – – –
but she did.  Very often, when she feared
that she was not in control, she shouted in rage.  I recall seeing her screaming at my oldest
brother and beating him.  She hit my
father so hard that she burst his eardrum.
When
I went to university in Europe, my parents drove me to the university
campus.  It was late evening and becoming
dark.  My father took one wrong turn
where there was very little street-light and no outlet.  He had to turn around.  Simple enough; however, my mother panicked
and began screaming hysterically.  At the
time, I did not understand.  Now I do.
My
brothers and I have realized for some time that, even though we were, what
psychologists call, a “looking good family,” word got around about my
mother.  New neighbors were warned to
avoid getting to know my mother.  We
brothers and my father suffered long-term damage from that environment.  My father, early on, withdrew as much as he could
into his own world, finding every reason to go to his office, take the car for
a wash, or do some other chore that would take him away from the house.  My oldest brother adopted the same
dictatorial and controlling behaviors with his family.  He also eventually disassociated himself from
our parents and never went back to see them, even at their funerals.  My middle brother became the rebel and stayed
away from the family as much as possible, even disappearing for some years
after his marriage.  My late friend Dr.
Bob observed in me, what he said was, a rare trait of reacting to my past
experiences by instinctively developing an unusual degree of sensitivity and
empathy for other people, something that apparently helped me to be affective
in my profession.  Apparently, I was good
at taking care of other people, but not myself.
Yet,
despite the damage done to our family, I cannot but help but feel great
sympathy for my poor mother.  She
suffered greatly in her childhood, and I am not sure how much true joy or love
that she felt in her life.  As for me, I
know that, as they say, “I’ve carried a lot of baggage throughout my
life.”  It took me some years to
understand why. 
And,
now that I have told you this story, I will put it on our blog for others to read
and to think about.  But, for myself, now
that I have read this unhappy tale to you, I will dispose of it and remove it
from my computer.  It is too painful for
me to keep or to read again.
© 14 June 2016 
About the Author 
I have had a life-long fascination with
people and their life stories.  I also
realize that, although my own life has not brought me particular fame or
fortune, I too have had some noteworthy experiences and, at times, unusual
ones.  Since I joined this Story Time
group, I have derived pleasure and satisfaction participating in the group.  I do put some thought and effort into my
stories, and I hope that you find them interesting.

Communication, by Ricky

          What weve got here is …. failure to
communicate
is a movie line from Cool Hand Luke spoken by Paul
Newman that is perfectly delivered, humorously and sarcastically, in keeping
with the character’s personality. 
Unfortunately for Luke, the senior guard was not amused, receptive, or
tolerant of the mocking of the Captain’s phrase.  Herein lies the difficulty with communicating
with anyone; words.
          The
Captain and the Boss were communicating a message to Luke but their words were
not precise enough for Luke to clearly understand.  Thus, the Captain and the Boss were the ones
who failed to communicate.  They should
have made it perfectly clear that if Luke tried to escape again, he would be
shot dead; they didn’t and Luke died.
         
          Words
arrive containing varying numbers of syllables, shades of meaning, and ease of
pronunciation.  The definition of words
can be modified from the original by common usage, which tends to happen
because members of society do not learn enough vocabulary so they can pick the
perfectly accurate but seldom used word. 
Some people use many long words and complex sentences to communicate
simple ideas; a practice which often leads to misunderstandings.  There are yet others who can communicate
powerful ideas using simple and everyday words. 
An example is Abraham Lincoln’s statement, “You can fool some of the
people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot
fool all of the people all of the time.” 
Do you suppose Lincoln was warning other politicians, warning the
public, or giving politicians a tip on how to get elected?
          Some
communications take on a life of their own and are so common in usage as to
become clichés.  “Houston, we have a
problem.” is one of those. The phrase originated following the Apollo 13
disaster.  Unfortunately, no one ever
said those words.  Here is the actual
conversation between the Houston command center and Apollo 13.
John Swigert: ‘Okay,
Houston, we’ve had a problem here.’
Houston: ‘This is Houston. Say again please.’
James Lovell: ‘Houston, we’ve had a problem. We’ve had a main B bus
undervolt.’ 
          For
dramatic effect, the movie of the events surrounding Apollo 13, altered the
exact words.  The incorrect phrase was
picked up by the movie going public and now is commonly used to indicate any
problem not just very serious ones.
          Likewise,
“Beam me up, Scotty” is a catchphrase
that made its way into popular culture from the science fiction television series Star Trek. Though it has become
irrevocably associated with the series and movies, the exact phrase was never
actually spoken in any Star Trek television
episode or film.
          “Beam me up, Scotty” is similar to the phrase,
“Just the facts ma’am”, attributed to Jack Webb’s character of Joe
Friday on Dragnet; “It’s elementary, my dear
Watson”, attributed to Sherlock Holmes; “Luke, I am your
father”, attributed to Darth Vader; or “Play it again, Sam”,
attributed to Humphrey Bogart’s character in Casablanca; and “We don’t need no stinkin’ badges!”
attributed to Gold Hat in The
Treasure of the Sierra Madre
.  All five
lines are the best-known quotations from these works for many viewers, but not one is an actual,
direct quotation.  Yet each of them
conveys an idea, concept, and image that communicates very well because a large
number of people have seen the source of the misquoted dialog and the erroneous
version has become ubiquitous in our culture. 
          Communication also suffers when the sender and the receiver
are not talking about the same concept or idea. Remember the dialogue between Tom Hanks and Elizabeth Perkins in the
movie “Big”?
          Susan: I’m not so sure we should do this.
          Josh: Do what?
          Susan: Well, I like you … and
I want to spend the night with you.
          Josh: Do you mean sleep over?
          Susan: Well, yeah.
          Josh: OK … but I get to be on
top.
          One conversation between two different people, but on two
incompatible topics.  This particular
conversation also illustrates the effect differences in age and experience (or
lack thereof) can have upon the inferred meaning of the words heard.
          Yet another problem with communication arises when one
party doesn’t understand the clear and plain message he was given or does not
take it seriously.  While in the Air
Force, one of my commanding officers was a colonel and a pilot.  He related to me the following.
          Before becoming a pilot he was a navigator on a military
transport aircraft approaching his U.S. destination after crossing the Atlantic
Ocean.  The plane was understandably low
on fuel.  Their primary destination had
bad weather to the point that they could not land and there was just enough
fuel to make it to the alternate airport. 
The navigator called the traffic controller for permission to depart for
the alternate destination.  He was told
to standby to which he replied that they needed to leave now or not have enough
fuel to make it.  Again, he was told to
standby.  He repeated the situation yet
again and was told to standby.  At this
point the pilot called on the intercom asking if they had permission to depart
for the alternate airport.  The navigator
told him “yes” even though no permission was given.  The person on the ground did not appreciate
the gravity of the situation and let himself be bogged down with control
issues.
          Sometimes the person initiating the communication sends an
accurate message composed of factual data but in reality doesn’t state the
actual issue.  For example, when I was
young I once told my mother that my urine was runny (a fact), which did not
impart any information to her.  The real
issue was I had diarrhea.  Another
example would be the numerous politicians who when asked a question answer with
information not directly related to the question.  I think they have a condition known as
“Diarrhea of the Mouth”.
          The moral of this essay: 
Be gay when the concept or idea or message goes through without
resulting in chaos.  The word “gay” is
used correctly, but did it, the other words, and the sentence structure combine
to confuse or clarify the message?  This
is yet another example of the potential for a message to get “lost in
translation” when there is a poor choice of words and grammar by the sender.
          The real moral of this essay:  In your next life, pay attention in language
class.
© 22 April
2012
 
About the Author 
 I was born in June of 1948 in Los Angeles, living first in Lawndale
and then in Redondo Beach.  Just prior to
turning 8 years old in 1956, I was sent to live with my grandparents on their
farm in Isanti County, Minnesota for two years during which time my parents
divorced.
When united with my mother and stepfather two years later
in 1958, I lived first at Emerald Bay and then at South Lake Tahoe, California,
graduating from South Tahoe High School in 1966.  After three tours of duty with the Air Force,
I moved to Denver, Colorado where I lived with my wife and four children until
her passing away from complications of breast cancer four days after the 9-11-2001
terrorist attack.
I came out as a gay man in the summer of 2010.   I find writing these memories to be
therapeutic.
My story blog is: TheTahoeBoy.Blogspot.com 

Choices, by Ray S

  
Never had
to make a choice or decision because my mother always did that for me. That’s
what mothers do.
The US
government decided I was draftable like all the other boys my age in 1943.
Faced with making a choice as to what branch of the service would want me, it
resulted in a trip to the US Army Air Corps office and enlisting in their air
cadet program. It seemed the best choice of all evils and besides I didn’t think
I’d fit nicely into a tight white sailor suit.
Footnote
here: Can you imagine me flying an airplane? I couldn’t even drive a car then.
The Air Corps was making all of our choices now having replaced Mama. As good fortune
would have it, the cadet program was oversubscribed, so the powers that be (or
were) scattered all of this wet behind the ears pubescent material to the
winds. The talented ones went to aircraft mechanics school.  The rest of the class members, having
finished basic training in the wilds of Gulfport, were shipped off to a
military police contingent where they were assigned to 11 pm to 7 am guard
duty. Here we could reflect on our recently basic training that had taught all
of the little boys how to be good little soldiers, drink beer, smoke
cigarettes, strip down and reassemble a carbine, report on parade grounds at 6
am dressed only in your issue raincoat for “short arm” VD inspection (and he
wouldn’t show us his), learn the intricacies of KP duty, and checking the
scenery in the barracks shower.
Eventually
through discovery, familiarity, or unknowing choices, the appearance of latent
libidos or the right time and the right place, this boy found out what people meant
by the pejoratives “queer” and “fairy.” However there was a conscious effort
called ‘in denial’ to not own those words openly for some thirty to forty years
hence.
Dating and
girls:
It was a
blind date that never ended until she delivered an ultimatum. The morning of
the wedding the butterflies kept saying, “Do you really want this?” But, the
die was cast, no choice, just make the best of it — for fifty-five years. And there
were many good times and some not so good.
Is chance a
choice or is choice a chance? A sunny day in June, crowds gathered at Civic
Center Plaza, and I chose to hang out on the perimeter of all the action
observing what PRIDE was all about.
Another
CHOICE, after all of this time it was becoming easier—attending a SAGE of the
Rockies conference. Meeting and learning to know there was a place for me in
this beautiful tribe; and I belonged. Knowing I could reach out and love freely
and openly. Finding I finally could come out of a closet I had lived in all of
these years. I realize now that I might be the only person that didn’t know or
suspect I was and am queer—in the most positive sense. My closet like many
others suffered from structural transparency.
Now I am
faced with another CHOICE. Trying to determine is this ‘indiscriminate love’ or
‘unconditional love’ that I feel for all of you; and is there really that much
of a difference?
© 11 July 2016 
About the Author 

A Stroll at the Denver Art Museum, by Phillip Hoyle

Artists sometimes open our eyes to realities and injustices
the society tolerates. Friday at the art museum my granddaughters Rose and
Ulzii took off on their own. I walked with my daughter-in-law Heather, one of
the most intelligent and creative persons I have ever known, also one of the
most open personalities I have ever spent time with. She and I have been good
friends ever since the day my son Michael brought her and her three-year-old
son to our house. She’s highly educated, teaches writing at college and
secondary levels, and with my son has reared a quartet of unusually bright and
talented youngsters: two boys, two girls.
Heather and I sat in chairs in the ‘Matisse and Friends’
gallery on the first floor of the Hamilton Building of the museum while the
girls went their own way. They had become tired of Mom and Grandpa talking so
intensely over the previous two days! Sitting there Heather and I discussed the
art and our two days of visits and interviews at culinary schools, of bus and
light rail trips around metro Denver, of meals and walks, and of her children,
the boys as well as the girls whom we had accompanied the past two days.
Then I suggested we take my favorite stroll through the
museum accessed by riding the elevator to the fourth floor. There we saw mostly
empty walls since most of the area was being re-hung. We walked down the huge
staircase beneath the impressive Calder mobile. At the foot of the stairs we
turned to the installation with grey foxes cavorting in a red café. Heather was
especially thrilled with this work. We walked on through the narrow north
hallway and entered a gallery that usually offers some kind of audio-video
experience. Although I had seen the current installation several times, Heather
had not. She caught the title “Lot’s Wife” and with her deep curiosity took in
the tall mannequin with white skin, white clothing, and long white hair, a
figure that from her meadow-like setting gazed at a projected lakeshore.
Heather read it as a depiction of Lot’s wife after she had glanced back toward
Sodom, the hometown she and Lot were leaving, a glance against Yahweh’s
command. In the ancient story from Genesis due to her disobedience, the wife
turned into a pillar of salt, thus the white the artist selected. Then Heather
noted the thick, muscular neck of the figure, then the very male profile of the
face. The artist wants to push us! Oh my God! Was Lot’s wife a man? Was Lot
homosexual? Was his wife transgendered or a cross-dresser? The questions piled
up. The rationalizations multiplied. The objections flourished. And finally the
truth of it settled on both of us. Gay folk cannot turn away from who they are
even in the face of nearly universal opposition!
I know from a careful study of the ancient text and its
ensuing interpretation that the story’s meaning is not anti-homosexual. It’s a
story about lacking hospitality, but of course these days that sounds too
wimpy. The Hebrew God demanded hospitality to strangers not rejection. That
demand is at the heart of biblical story after biblical story in the Hebrew and
Greek bibles. But our artist, Canadian Kent Monkman, wasn’t worried about
historical interpretations. He, a Cree Indian, is concerned about the deeply
embedded prejudice inherent in our culture and society that fears anything
Native and homosexual, anything queer, or as Wikipedia defines it in its
article on homophobia, anything LGBT! Whoa! LGB and T. Yes.
Heather ‘got it’ as my artist friend Sue would say.
Gods can often seem unfair, especially ancient Gods evaluated
by post modern humans. It just doesn’t seem right that when Apollo couldn’t
resist looking back at Eurydice that she then disappeared and couldn’t
make the trip from Hades to be reunited with her husband. It doesn’t seem right
that when Lot’s wife (of course they left out her name—which in this
interpretative context seems like double trouble!) glanced backward at her
hometown she was leaving to avoid its destruction that she was destroyed
anyway.
The artist now seems to be telling LGBs and Ts to watch out.
Don’t look back at your fears; don’t doubt the truth of your own reality; don’t
get scared at what you are becoming—or you may become a pillar of salt or melt
into nothing. DON’T BE AFRAID.
So my little stroll through the museum challenged me to leave
my own homo fears and embrace this new life, one of possibility, challenge, and
hope.
Watching Heather process the installation gave me hope for
our family of young adults establishing themselves in creative work, of the ability
of the supporting generations to help them, of myself to keep getting over the
deeply hidden fears generated by being so truly queer.
* * * * *
Here’s my testimony!
In addition to being deeply loved by a number of men I have
never been so assisted in this fearless task so much as I have by coming week
after week to this SAGE storytelling group—telling my stories and hearing
yours.
The process of community, sharing, paying attention, working
to express exactly what I have experienced and mean conspire to keep away the
fearsome temptations and to clarify just what I need to pay attention to as I
continue to grow as a truly Queer, truly LGBT person.
Thanks to you.
Thanks to artists like Kent Monkman.
Thanks to a changing social scene that supports even more
changes in the lives of LGBTs as Qs, and more.
© Denver,
Dec 2014
 
About the Author 
Phillip Hoyle
lives in Denver and spends his time writing, painting, and socializing. In
general he keeps busy with groups of writers and artists. Following thirty-two
years in church work and fifteen in a therapeutic massage practice, he now
focuses on creating beauty. He volunteers at The Center leading the SAGE
program “Telling Your Story.”
He also blogs at artandmorebyphilhoyle.blogspot.com

Movies, by Pat Gourley

Unlike many of my gay
male brethren in particular, I am not a great fan of the big screen.  A consistent theme in my life has been to
almost exclusively read non-fiction books and that spills over these days to
rarely seeing any movie that is not a documentary. I am fond of anything
dealing with political themes but in rather cowardly fashion I suppose I do avoid
films on the climate crisis. I find them very valuable but so disturbingly truthful
and realistic I can’t watch. I suppose I do watch documentaries because I am
lazy and it’s easier to just sit back and have it all laid out for me. Reaching
for the popcorn is easier than reading and having to continually turn the page.
Perhaps this avoidance to
film dates back to the first movie I ever saw in a theatre and that was
Disney’s Old Yeller. A quick
refresher: the movie takes place in Texas in 1869 and the star is a loveable
yellow lab, who would put Lassie to shame any day. Yeller of course had the
advantage of being teamed up with a much more relatable friend in 15 year old
Travis. Lassie was burdened with Timmy who seemed destined in every episode to
make really stupid choices that only his dog could save him from. What of
course so seared Old Yeller into my
psyche was that he gets rabies fighting off a predatory wolf and has to be shot
by Travis. I never really got past this despite the Disney attempts to soften
the ending with a new puppy for the family. Sorry, the damage was done. I
actually don’t think I saw any movies after that until the James Bond movies
came out and the obvious draw for me to these films was James and not any of
the Fox-News-personality-type female sexual partners central to every Bond
film.
I do though appreciate
how important film is to the LGBT community and the tremendous impact this can
have in both very positive ways and damagingly negative reinforcement of out
internalized homophobia. So much of our early coming out is the struggle to find
the “other”, a soul we can relate to. The search to find someone else like us
is often relentless. The game-changing realization that I am not alone is
certainly a recurring theme bringing us back again and again to celluloid
escapism as a way to soothe our pain. Gay men in particular may want to be fucked
by the leading man but it is the strong female leads that have been our succor
for decades and we grasp at any hit of a queer character or theme.
Perhaps the singular
patron saint of the tortured history of Queers and their portrayal in film was
Vito Russo. He is best known for his landmark book the Celluloid Closet, still easily available and I suspect or hope a
copy or two is in The Center’s library. Russo
was one of the founders of GLAAD in 1985; previously know as the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
In recognition of bisexual and trans-persons the organization is now just GLAAD
and no long an acronym.  GLAAD was
initially formed in response to the hateful and vile portrayal of persons with AIDS
by the New York media particularly the New York Post. Vito Russo himself died
from AIDS in 1990.
GLAAD remains quite
active today keeping a watchful eye on all forms of media for inaccurate
portrayals of Queer folk. They have developed their own criteria for analyzing
how LGBT characters are portrayed called the Vito Russo Test. This link is to
their web site: http://www.glaad.org
This Vito Russo Test is
patterned after the “Bechdel Test” which is used to look at how women are
portrayed in film. I have included the criteria for the Russo test and they are
as follows:
1.The film
contains a character that is identifiably lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or
transgender.
2. That character
must not be solely or predominantly defined by their sexual orientation or
gender identity. I.E. they are made up of the same sort of unique character
traits commonly used to differentiate straight characters from one another.
3. The LGBT
character must be tied into the plot in such a way that their removal would
have a significant effect. Meaning they are not there to simply provide
colorful commentary, paint urban authenticity, or (perhaps most commonly) set
up a punchline. The character must matter.
These criteria are taken from GLAAD’s 2016
Studio Responsibility Index. Unfortunately, this year out of 22 films with
significant LGBT characters only 8 or 36% have met these criteria and that is
apparently a significant decrease from recent years. http://www.glaad.org/sri/2016/vitorusso
Our struggle continues; so to the
barricades brother and sisters or at least to the theatres with a
discriminating eye.
© 25 July 2016
About the Author  
I was born in La Porte Indiana in 1949, raised on a farm and schooled
by Holy Cross nuns. The bulk of my adult life, some 40 plus years, was spent in
Denver, Colorado as a nurse, gardener and gay/AIDS activist. I have currently returned to Denver after an
extended sabbatical in San Francisco, California. 

Good Hunting, Nicholas

For the last few years I have been compiling memories in the
form of memoir essays. It’s fun and interesting to recollect what I have done
with my life over the years. I do not see myself writing an autobiography, however,
but rather being selective on episodes to delve into. I do not begin at my true
beginning with my childhood which, to me, seems as uninteresting now as it was
then. A pretty ordinary stretch of life filled with good memories but little
drama, a time that I don’t see as worth writing about.
So, it’s not really my life story that I am filling pages
with but reflections on where life has taken me. It has taken me many
fascinating places. And I enjoy remembering where I have gone. Memory is, to
paraphrase a common saying, like drinking sea water—the more you drink, the
thirstier you get. Writing a memoir is like a quest. You might say, I am
hunting my past.
I was remembering an episode in my past last week and the
more I thought about it and wrote out the story, the more that came to me. The story
was about the day a kind, older man tempted me out of my closet. He didn’t
succeed. I was foolish enough to pass up the opportunity he offered. I thought
I had written out the story. But then, wait, something else happened back then.
He said something to me. What was it? I plied my memory until it started coming
back to me. He said something like, “You don’t have to be alone, you know.” I’d
forgotten that last part.
The tools I use in this hunt include not only my memory of
events—fond or not so fond—but also documents, old journals, and, lots of
published clips from my days as a journalist in San Francisco. I sometimes even
do some research and fact checking.
I have all the documents, for example, of the struggle with
my draft board from 1968 to 1972 that culminated in my refusing induction into
the U.S. Army. Having long had a fondness for writing, I wrote for some
underground papers in California back then and actually found copies in the San
Francisco Public Library. Some of those pieces I’m proud of and some I dismiss
as just getting carried away with the rhetoric of that era. Did I really call
the President of the United States a pig? Well, he probably deserved it.
The only time in my life that I kept a personal journal was
when I began coming out. I wrote in it faithfully almost every day for a few
years and found it a great way to see who I was and how I was changing. Some
memories are flattering and some are not. At times, I am roaring with happiness
from new found friends and experiences. Other times, I am wishing it would all
go away and I could just be normal, whatever that might mean. It helps to see
the bad with the good.
My hunt has produced results, maybe I should call them
trophies. I am seeing patterns that I like. It seems to me that my life has
been blessed with two Spring times and maybe even a third. Twice I have felt
desperate and besieged by forces beyond my control and twice I have responded
to those challenges by entering a time of creativity and change. The first time
was when I decided to drop out of college and take on the military draft. That
led to a multitude of incredible experiences. The second spring came of course
when I embraced being gay and found friendship and love, challenge and
strength, community and history.
And the third spring? Well, it seems to be right now. As I’m
growing older, I find myself again in a period of challenge and change and
great creativity at the same time. I like remembering my past, chasing it down,
writing it down. This hunt has its satisfactions in knowing the ground on which
I now stand. Where I’m headed is growing out of where I’ve been. I like being a
hunter and the hunt goes on.
© 19 Sep 2016 
About the Author 
 Nicholas grew up in Cleveland,
then grew up in San Francisco, and is now growing up in Denver. He retired from
work with non-profits in 2009 and now bicycles, gardens, cooks, does yoga,
writes stories, and loves to go out for coffee.

Help, by Louis Brown

Basically
the Beatles lyrics speak for themselves. I was thinking “Help” could
also mean “the Help”, the servants as in a turn of the century upper
class household. Think “Upstairs, Downstairs.” A study of social
class structure in England, back then. I wonder if the other authors of our
group have thought of the Beatles. Some have, I bet.

I Get by with a Little Help from My Friends
Help!
When I’m Sixty-Four



[Here is a link to see the lyrics to the above songs. Ed.
© 16 Sep 2016 
About
the Author
 
 I was born in 1944, I lived most of my life in New York City,
Queens County. I still commute there. I worked for many years as a Caseworker
for New York City Human Resources Administration, dealing with mentally
impaired clients, then as a social work Supervisor dealing with homeless PWA’s.
I have an apartment in Wheat Ridge, CO. I retired in 2002. I have a few
interesting stories to tell. My boyfriend Kevin lives in New York City. I
graduated Queens College, CUNY, in 1967.

Long Ago, Far Away, by Lewis

[The following is a confidential
memorandum,
dated May 25, 1998, which I delivered to The Rev. Jamie
Rasmussen, then-pastor at Grace Community Church in Detroit, Michigan, after
listening to a tape of a sermon he delivered titled, “What Would Jesus Say
to Ellen DeGeneres”.  This was
shortly after Ellen came out on her TV show.] 
Although we did not
exchange names, we met this past Friday when I came into Grace Community Church
to buy a tape of your sermon titled “What
Would Jesus Say to Ellen DeGeneres?”

You were surprisingly young and full of sunny energy as we passed in the
office doorway.  You asked me what tape I
wanted.  I told you and you said that you
had given that sermon and told me to let you know what I thought of it.  I thanked you and went on my way, tape in
hand.
I have listened to the
tape three times now and would be happy to share my thoughts with you.  Let me begin by saying that I am a gay man of
52 who has been in a monogamous marriage for 25 years.  I have two adult children and a very
comfortable life, at least on the surface. 
The fact is that my wife and I have decided to begin a gradual separation
process because I have come, finally and almost inevitably, to the conclusion
that I can no longer feel happy and fulfilled living without the love of
another man.  For most of my adult life,
I bought the popular myth–as I believe you have–that homosexuality was a
“lifestyle” which involved choosing whether I would engage in sex
with a woman (my wife) in the context of a loving, caring relationship, or with
a series of men, always without real human connection and love.  Placed in this context, the choice seemed
rather simple.  After all, weren’t these
urges I felt merely lust, a desire for a quick fix of heated passion followed
by days and weeks–even months–of desolation, guilt, and shame?
Though you may not
believe it, let me tell you that no heterosexual can possibly understand the
torment that came from trying to live my life ever faithful to what society
expected of me and in complete sublimation of my truest inner nature.  I felt like the Ugly Duckling who never, ever
sees a swan but always thinks of himself as different, degenerate, inherently
unlovable.  Over the course of the past
half-dozen years, I have been gradually emerging from my cocoon of self-hatred
into the light.  I have discussed my
orientation with counselors, friends, clergy, family, and co-workers.  I have become active in the politics of
gender identity and sexual orientation.  I
learned that my own internalized homophobia can be overcome and that I, too,
sometimes misjudge people by stereotyping them as “homophobic”.  My wife and kids know that I am gay and love
me just the same.  (I told my wife even
before we were married that I was attracted to men.)
You need to hear that I
WAS NEVER CONFUSED ABOUT MY SEXUAL ORIENTATION–at least since the age of
13–but only terrified of being discovered. 
In your sermon, you keep referring to gays and lesbians as
“confused”.  They aren’t the
ones who are confused.  It’s you and
people like you who are confused–confused about what it means to be a
homosexual.  You seem to feel, if I interpret
your words correctly, that gays and lesbians are “OK”–that is,
worthy of “unconditional love”–as long as they don’t act on their
feelings of attraction.  Can you imagine
someone saying to a heterosexual, “I love you as a person but I hate it when
you act on your feelings of attraction to a person of the opposite
sex”?  What you are asking of gay
men and lesbians is to do one of two things: 
1) get married to a person who may or may not know what they are getting
into and live a false existence for as long as the marriage lasts; or 2) remain
celibate (and, therefore, essentially loveless) for life.  What a choice!  Both essentially deprive a person of the
greatest joys of human existence while condemning them to countless hours of
pain and self-recrimination!
Your kind of
“unconditional love”–loving the “sinner” but hating the
“sin”–is pretty cheap!  We
know that Jesus loved the thieves who died with him on the cross, as well as
the men who caused his death.  He forgave
them and welcomed them into the Kingdom of Heaven.  Are we to believe that a lesbian or gay man
who commits an act of love with another human being, regardless of gender, is
less worthy of acceptance than these are? 
The Jesus I know is SILENT about homosexuality.  How do you presume to speak for Jesus when he
himself was silent?  He did say that the
greatest commandments are these:  to love
God with all my heart, mind, and soul and to love my neighbor as myself.  Is it possible that he thought of all
people–straight or gay–as “neighbors”?
On the subject of
homosexuality as “sin”, I rely on John Boswell’s Christianity,
Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality
(still in print and available at the
Grosse Pointe Public Library and at Barnes & Noble).  On pages 100 thru 114, he addresses all three
scriptures you cite in your talk, going back to the original language for
contextual meaning.  He concludes, with
regard to the citation from Leviticus,
that the Hebrew word “toevah”,
there translated as “abomination”, as in “Thou shall not lie with
mankind, as with womankind:  it is an
abomination”, does not usually signify something intrinsically evil but
something ritually unclean for Jews, like eating pork or engaging in
intercourse during menstruation.  Boswell
points out that the word “toevah”
is used throughout the Old Testament
to designate those Jewish sins that involve ethnic contamination, as in the
stock phrase “toevah ha-goyim”,
meaning “the uncleanness of the Gentiles”.  Such an interpretation would have no
significance for Christians.
With regard to the Romans I citation, Boswell argues that
the persons Paul condemns are manifestly not homosexual.  He is speaking of homosexual acts committed
by apparently heterosexual persons. 
“The whole point of Romans I,
in fact, is to stigmatize persons who have rejected their calling, gotten off
the true path they were once on.  What
caused the Romans to sin was not that
they lacked what Paul considered proper inclinations but that they had
them
:  they held the truth, but ‘in
unrighteousness’ (v. 18) because ‘they did not see fit to retain Him in their
knowledge’ (v. 28).  [I]t is quite
apparent that…Paul did not discuss gay persons
but only homosexual acts committed by
heterosexual persons [emphasis in the
original].
Finally, as to the
citation from 1st Corinthians 6:9,
Boswell’s argument is purely semantic. 
Of the two Greek words used in the original and now taken to indicate
that “homosexuals” will be excluded from the Kingdom of Heaven, one
applied, up until the 20th Century, to masturbation–a “sin” no
longer widely considered worthy of condemnation to Hell–and the other, best
evidence suggests, meant to Paul’s generation a “male
prostitute”.  Thus, we see that upon
close examination of the cited passages, nowhere does the Bible actually
condemn homosexual acts between committed, loving, lesbians or gay men–at
least, if they are Gentiles.  I encourage
you, Jamie, to study the Roswell text yourself in its entirety.
You almost had me fooled,
Jamie.  I was ready to concede that you
really cared about gays and lesbians. 
Your voice has such a compassionate ring to it.  But near the end, you betray your real
feelings when you announce your opposition to the efforts of gays and lesbians
to secure the same rights to be free from discrimination that you and other
heterosexuals take for granted.  You even
raise the tired, old red flag of protecting the children!  What of those gay or lesbian children who may
have been in your audience?  Evidence
shows that many gay boys realize their orientation by the age of 11.  How would they feel about themselves after
hearing your speech?  What kind of a
future can they look forward to–either devoid of intimacy or condemned by
God?  Why wouldn’t suicide seem
attractive?  You’re right to be concerned
for the children but the threat comes from the vibes of your own sound system,
not from some faceless gay pedophile.
[In researching what Rev. Rasmussen has
been up to in the interim, it appears that my excoriating memo did nothing to
damage his career in the ministry.  The
very next year, he left Detroit to lead an old, historic church in London,
Ontario, in transitioning to a “small-group-based, outreach-focused”
one, whose membership grew by 29 per cent in the two years he was there.  In 2001, he left London for Chagrin Falls,
Ohio, where he pastured at the Fellowship Bible Church for six years, growing
its membership from 650 to 1400. 
“Chagrin” is an apt word for my reaction upon learning that
since 2007, “Jamie”, as he prefers to be called, has been the Senior
Pastor of Scottsdale Bible Church with its 6000 adult members and 10- to 12,000
subscribers to the church’s newsletter. 
He has a staff of two dozen pastors and ministers and 100
employees.  Incidentally, he never
responded to my memo.]
© 16 Sep 2013 
About
the Author
 
I came to the
beautiful state of Colorado out of my native Kansas by way of Michigan, the
state where I married and I came to the beautiful state of Colorado out of my
native Kansas by way of Michigan, the state where I married and had two
children while working as an engineer for the Ford Motor Company. I was married
to a wonderful woman for 26 happy years and suddenly realized that life was
passing me by. I figured that I should make a change, as our offspring were
basically on their own and I wasn’t getting any younger. Luckily, a very
attractive and personable man just happened to be crossing my path at that
time, so the change-over was both fortuitous and smooth.
Soon after, I
retired and we moved to Denver, my husband’s home town. He passed away after 13
blissful years together in October of 2012. I am left to find a new path to
fulfillment. One possibility is through writing. Thank goodness, the SAGE
Creative Writing Group was there to light the way.

Slippery Sexuality, by Gillian

Sex itself is of course
physically slippery, as designed by nature. Metaphysically, metaphorically,
sexuality can be every bit as slippery.
It took me about forty
years to get a good grip on mine.
In my early years, I
would catch tantalizing glimpses of it, slithering sneakily about, just under
the surface, but before I could even reach for it, it plunged back down into
the murky deep; out of sight but never quite out of mind. Certainly, never
completely absent from other body parts. I felt its presence but could not, or
would not, identify it.
In my thirties, it began
making itself more visible; more identifiable. Like a dolphin beside a boat it
now skimmed alongside me, only occasionally disappearing beneath the surface waves,
and more often leaping into the air in full view. It taunted me, it beckoned
me, this beautiful slippery temptation. It called to me, come on, come on,
come out and play!
Sometimes it led, sometimes it followed, but it never fell
behind. Occasionally it forged ahead, leading the way with its blissful
athletic leaps. This way, this way! For the most part it stayed by my
side. Sometimes the joyous frolicking threatened to capsize my boat.
Only with great effort did I keep it afloat.
It was a mirage, I knew.
This was no reality. Not my reality. No reality I wanted any part of. I blinked
and shook my head, and sure enough it was gone. The glorious creature
disappeared, no longer leaping before my hesitant self to show me the way. I
was left adrift on a sunless sea, once more becalmed and rudderless. It would
return to beckon me again and again, each time looming a little larger, but
although I occasionally reached a tentative hand in its direction, more rarely
even touched it, still it slithered away. I could never quite grasp it. The
leviathan returned to the deep.
Approaching forty – a
little early for a mid-life crisis, surely? – that seductive dolphin somehow
grew, matured, became huge, became that whale, that very leviathan which I had
somehow always sensed it to be. And I became that legendary mermaid. Despite my
slithery tail, I was suddenly on its back, hanging on to the slippery creature
with all my strength as we crashed together into the waves. Then we were no
longer two entities but one. I had embraced it fearlessly, wholeheartedly, and
become one with it. I was a part of it and it was a part of me. I swam against
the tide: against the waves, against the currents. They were powerless to stop
me, powerless to redirect my journey. I knew exactly where I was going and I
had the strength to get there.
Now I lie in the sun on a
beautiful beach. I snuggle into the caress of the warm white sand, just as I
cuddle into the warm caress of the wonderful woman I love; my partner of almost
thirty years, my spouse, my wife, the love of my life.
I am home.
© 16 Apr 2016 
About
the Author
 
 I
was born and raised in England. After graduation from college there, I moved to
the U.S. and, having discovered Colorado, never left. I have lived in the
Denver-Boulder area since 1965, working for 30-years at IBM. I married, raised
four stepchildren, then got divorced after finally, in my forties, accepting
myself as a lesbian. I have been with
my wonderful partner Betsy for thirty-years. We have been married since 2013.

Christmas 1905, by Cecil Bethea

Christmas should be a joyous
time when memories from years long gone bubble up in our minds.
We have honed the past
into a golden world never marred by human
excess.
Historians
know there are exceptions to this ideal.
For men at Valley
Forge, Christmas could have been another day of hunger and misery.
When the armies in blue
or grey along the Rappahannock near Fredericksburg,
Fought
by day and sang in unison by night,
Christmas could have been a day of dread.
The
Dust Bowl seared
© 5 Dec 2005 
About the Author  
 Although
I have done other things, my fame now rests upon the durability of my
partnership with Carl Shepherd; we have been together for forty-two years and
nine months as of today, August 18th, 2012.
Although
I was born in Macon, Georgia in 1928, I was raised in Birmingham during the
Great Depression.  No doubt I still carry
invisible scars caused by that era.  No
matter we survived.  I am talking about
my sister, brother, and I.  There are two
things that set me apart from people. 
From about the third grade I was a voracious reader of books on almost
any subject.  Had I concentrated, I would
have been an authority by now; but I didn’t with no regrets.
After
the University of Alabama and the Air Force, I came to Denver.  Here I met Carl, who picked me up in Mary’s
Bar.  Through our early life we traveled
extensively in the mountain West.  Carl
is from Helena, Montana, and is a Blackfoot Indian.  Our being from nearly opposite ends of the
country made “going to see the folks” a broadening experience.  We went so many times that we finally had
“must see” places on each route like the Quilt Museum in Paducah, Kentucky and
the polo games in Sheridan, Wyoming.  Now
those happy travels are only memories.
I was
amongst the first members of the memory writing class.  While it doesn’t offer criticism, it does
offer feedback.  Also just trying to
improve your writing helps no end.
Carl
is now in a nursing home; I don’t drive any more.  We totter on.