Closet Case by Phillip Hoyle

Business was slow, so rather than just sit around wondering where my clients had gone, I got to work at home doing fall cleaning, that work where obsession facilitates doing a complete inventory of one’s possessions and an effective chasing of dirt from one place to another. It served to produce a lightening of the load and a freshening of my domestic environment. I ran the vacuum sweeper, dusted walls and woodwork, sorted randomly created stacks of papers, recycled all those things I had not got to or that no longer pertained, and carried out a ton of trash. I shook area rugs filling the autumn air with countless dust particles, knocked down cobwebs (after all, we didn’t need them for effect since Halloween was over), and even dusted the leaves of the fake fichus tree that so effectively fills one corner of the room. I washed the king-size linens, even the quilted spread, and added an insulated blanket to prepare the bed for the turning weather. With all that work completed, I had used up most of a day and so carried the electric sweeper to the basement.

The next morning I attacked that space making ready for the arrival of company for Thanksgiving. I loaded the CD player with some high energy music I rarely listen to and went to work all in a frenzy. Again there was laundry, sorting, carrying away recyclable materials, getting rid of cobwebs, washing windows, and the extra job of finding more out-of-the-way spaces for stowing my too-many framed pieces of art. The day passed quickly, too quickly, since as shadows lengthened I realized there was still too much work to do. I sat in a chair and stared at the closet door wondering what I’d find in there were I to open it.

Finally, as the room darkened with evening and my mood darkened, I wondered if I’d ever open that door. I felt sure I wouldn’t like everything I’d find there. “Oh, just do it,” I said to myself, rose from the chair, and threw open the accordion door to face the closet with its mementos, out-of-date equipment, and discarded values. I wasn’t surprised to find such things; after all aren’t closets meant to stow things out of sight? But I faced along with them a truckload of feelings, some of them that I had almost forgotten.

Immediately I saw the old LPs; the SONY reel-to-reel and a box of tapes; a stack of boxes of jigsaw puzzles solved last winter; fold up tables and chairs; table games for when company arrives; an old violin that had been in the family for generations and hasn’t been played for eons. I dusted these off, as I’d done annually for almost a decade. Then I turned my attention to unmarked boxes of uncertain content.
In one cardboard box I discovered my Diplomas; for years I’d gone to school, studied, was graduated from high school, college, and seminary. Years and careers ago.

In another box I discovered photos of my marriage, our growing family, and friends left behind in the several places I’d lived. One photograph shows me standing with my new wife by our black and white 56 Chevy one August afternoon at Lands End, a spot on Grand Mesa overlooking the desert that stretches off to the west. I wonder now what marriage even felt like.

Ooh, there are spider webs as well as dust. Do I really want to go any further?

On one shelf sat books, ones I had completely forgotten about since I hadn’t used any of their information for years. First were three large-print children’s dictionaries of the English Language, each one a specialized lexicon of appropriate usage: the first, language appropriate for school and church; the second, language appropriate for home; the third, language appropriate to use with my best buddies. I smiled, realizing that the habit of closeting one’s usage was a strategy of manners and survival practiced even by young children, especially ones of unusual proclivity.

Other books were there, volumes on sexuality, ethics, theology, and philosophy. They, too, hadn’t been opened in years, for when I had emerged from my closet I was no longer interested in their content. Well, not exactly, but my interest took a different turn, served a different purpose. I had considered their arguments, their insights, their potential. I had appropriated what I could and when I finally pushed myself out the door, left the books behind. Still their ideas inform my sense of self as I go about my weekly schedule and bolster my resolve to be ‘out’ when I meet new people and situations. But I quit buying updates of arguments on the same topics, content with my newer identity. Why I’ve kept these few I’m not sure. They represent the intensity of my inquiry into society and my life. I decided I was able to let them go and put them in the pile of things to give to Goodwill. Maybe they’ll help someone else.

Then there are the novels. I realize they, too, helped open me to my then future life as a gay man. I’d read them for decades trying to find myself among their characters. I’d especially searched for myself in gay novels and despaired that I must be so queer as not to appear. But I have kept a couple of them: Ambidextrous by Felice Picano and I Don’t Think Were In Kansas Anymore by Ethan Mordden, the two gay novels in which I did appear. I’ll keep hold of them for their encouragement and sentimental value. I realize that my experience of the closet, while costly, also helped make me what I am. I honor even the hidden part of my past. I also decided to keep the Masters and Johnson volume for its information on STDs—a wise reminder—and one book of feminist arguments about prenatal existence, a good thing to remember when one facilitates a group of LGBT storytellers.

And there was another book: The Craft of Acting. I’d studied this one over and over for while I felt at home with my profession in the church and comfortable with my duplicity/triplicity in matters sexual, I still knew I had to act. One tells a story but has to do so in a way that an audience can hear and perceive what is intended.

With this thought I look suspiciously at two old suit cases of costumes: Indian costumes for dancing at powwows, an African robe and mask for a children’s program I once organized, and a clerical robe with stoles. Even though I rarely dressed up for Halloween, I did have my costumes, my own drag costumes exotic and clerical. By wearing these costumes I defined my difference in socially acceptable ways. I guess I should just give them to my grandkids. Who knows what they may be experiencing, what costumes they may need!

So on that evening of the second day of fall housecleaning, I decided to discard and to keep varying items from my old closeted days. I discarded those things I had learned all too well and kept symbols of the victories of walking from that cramped space in a search for freedom. That seems to be the case with all closets. They bare cleaning and reorganizing from time to time, but may I never forget my past closeted life so I will never think to hide there again.

Denver, 2012

About the Author

Phillip Hoyle lives in Denver and spends his time writing, painting, giving massages, and socializing. His massage practice funds his other activities that keep him busy with groups of writers and artists, and folk with pains. Following thirty-two years in church work, he now focuses on creating beauty and ministering to the clients in his practice. He volunteers at The Center leading “Telling Your Story.”

He also blogs at artandmorebyphilhoyle.blogspot.com

Closet Case by Gillian

What’s the difference between a Skoda car and a Jehovah’s Witness?
You can close the door on a Jehovah’s Witness.

Doors are what closets and closet cases are all about. And one thing you can say in defense of the closet, you have closed the door on yourself; you have the key in your pocket. It’s up to you when and if that door opens. There are other doors that close from the outside, and someone out there has the key.

A very closeted friend warned me, when I announced my plan to exit the closet,
“Think about it very carefully. Remember, you can’t go back. Once you come out, you are out for ever, like it or not, for good or ill.”
And of course she was right. That closet door, like the Skoda door, is either stuck wide open, exposing your sins to the world, or rusted shut since you de-closeted. You can’t go back in, to that dark, safe, if miserable, place you once inhabited.

Slamming that closet door firmly shut as I exited, in fact did me very little harm and a great deal of good, but that is not the story for everyone. Brave GLBT people lose families, jobs, friends; practically all of life as they had known it, and are still willing to pay that price for freedom from the closet and all it implies.

Betsy and I recently watched the movie, “Chely Wright: Wish Me Away.” This woman risked all in leaving the closet, and it cost her much of her very successful country music career and some of her family and friends, but it also offered huge compensations. None of the negatives were a shock; she knew what she was risking but she had to do what she had to do: a compunction most of us know only too well.
So, for most of us, no regrets about leaving that cold dark closet. For most of us in this time and place, that is.

I spent some months in Hungary at the time they were attempting to transition from Communism to Capitalism (yes, yes, I know, I should say to Democracy!)
World War Two is very in your face throughout Europe and I felt compelled to visit Auschwitz in nearby Poland.
I gazed at the photographs. Those pink triangles; those flesh free faces with fear filled eyes.
What the hell did I know of fear?

Those faces knew fear. Real fear.
And they could not return to the closet.
“Oh but it was just a phase, I’m OK now!” wouldn’t work any better for a homosexual than for a Jew.
“Well I thought I was Jewish for a while, but …. “
No. No escape.
They died for being what they were. At what stage of their journeys to Hell did they regret being “out?” For certain by the time they staggered under that Arbeit Macht Frei sign, but by then of course it was far too late. The closet option was long gone.

Alan Turing was responsible for breaking the German Enigma code during World War Two and is widely considered to be the father of computer science and artificial intelligence. He was a brilliant mathematician, but he was also gay, and homosexual activity was still illegal in postwar Britain. In 1952 he was arrested, and chose the offered alternative to a prison sentence, that of “chemical castration.” This meant taking large doses of estrogen, which messed with not only his body, but also his brilliant mind, and in 1954 he committed suicide.
At that time I still lived in England; in 1954 I was twelve years old.
No wonder I was so deep in the closet that my sexual orientation was a secret even from me.
In 2009, Prime Minister Gordon Brown made a public apology on behalf of the British government, for the “appalling way” in which Turing was treated.

Alas, not all governments have become so enlightened over time. In many countries homosexuality still results in a prison sentence, or indeed a death sentence as in Nigeria, Somalia, Mauritania, Sudan, the Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Yemen, and parts of Indonesia

So as we live with pride, with our heads held high, as indeed we should, let us spare a moment for all those who were, in the past, or are, in the present, not granted such privileges.
Yes we are brave and yes we are strong. But things come in different degrees.

If we faced the horrors that so many of us have done, and still do, I, for one, fear I would be a confirmed closet case.

Gillian November 2012

About the Author

I was born and raised in England. After graduation from college there, I moved to the U.S. and, having discovered Colorado, never left. I have lived in the Denver-Boulder area since 1965, working for 30 years at IBM. I married, raised four stepchildren, then got divorced after finally, in my forties, accepting myself as a lesbian. I have now been with my wonderful partner Betsy for 25 years.

Closet Case by Colin Dale

          I was helped out of the closet by a man who died in 1935—ten years before I was born—a man who never successfully got out of his own closet. In other words, this man who helped me out of the closet lived and died a closet case.

          I’m going to begin, though, in telling you how, in 1959, I became acquainted not with the man who helped me out of the closet but with his surviving brother, under totally unrelated circumstances—

          It’s 1959. I am 14 years old. I’m living with my mother, father, and older brother in a second floor walk-up apartment in the East Bronx. I know you’ve heard me talk about my growing-up years in The Bronx a number of times before. It helps though to visualize my working-class surroundings in order to understand the improbability of a kid in the East Bronx making the acquaintance of an Oxford professor of archaeology. In my growing up years, fathers, like my father, were laborers. Mothers, like my mother, were housewives. Fathers disappeared each morning to their factory jobs on the elevated subway—the “el.” Mothers led kids like me to public school. They shopped. And they cooked. I say with complete kindness my father and mother were not very well educated. They had come through the Great Depression, and in all things did the very best they could.

          I had an uncle though, a lion of a man, who, as a highly educated man, was an outlier in the family. He recognized in me a kindred bookworm. One day he delivered—to an apartment that could barely accommodate it—a 33-year-old set of the Britannica. The 1926 Britannica.

          Fourteen-year-old me wanted to be an archaeologist. I read in the Britannica every article I could find on archaeology. One article on Persian archaeology especially excited me. I decided to send the writer what today we would call a fan letter. The writer, the Britannica told me, was a “Arnold W. Lawrence, professor, Oxford.”

          I wrote my fan letter. In my innocence, I had addressed it to “Professor Arnold W. Lawrence, Oxford, England,” not knowing Oxford was a conglomerate of universities, and forgetting that the man who had written the article had written it more than three decades earlier.

          But months later I received a reply, from A.W. Lawrence, London. Professor Lawrence, 60, retired, was apparently stunned to get my fan letter. In 1926 for A.W. Lawrence, the Britannica article was an extraordinary credit. Professor Lawrence’s reply to my fan letter–a tissue-paper blue aerogram (which I have safely at home) was the beginning of a correspondence that lasted up and down, on and off for 31 years—although (and this is another story for another Monday), I met Professor Lawrence face-to-face only once, in 1990, two months before his death.

          Now, though, to bring the two brothers together—

          We move forward, from 1959 to 1962. I’m 17, studying architecture (so much for archaeology) at a vocational art school in Manhattan, and I’m corresponding every month or so from our second floor walk-up with this retired Oxford professor in London. And, I’m still closeted. A movie opens in Times Square, David Lean’s epic Lawrence of Arabia. I go to see it. I’m blown away. I never make the connection though—Lawrence and Lawrence—why should I? Lawrence is not an uncommon name. I want to learn more about Lawrence of Arabia. I stop in a midtown bookstore and I find a ratted copy of the Penguin The Essential T.E. Lawrence (that’s Lawrence of Arabia: Thomas Edward Lawrence). On the subway to the Bronx I pop the book and read in the sketch biography: “Thomas Edward Lawrence . . . five brothers . . . the youngest, Arnold Walter Lawrence.” Could this be? I think, this man I’ve been corresponding with for three years, could he be Lawrence of Arabia’s youngest brother? I write and ask, and of course he is.

          Thomas Edward Lawrence was born in 1888. His story is generally known, thanks to David Lean’s movie. Briefly: Lawrence studied at Oxford to be an archaeologist, went on a British Museum sponsored dig to the Middle East; at the onset of the First World War, he was drawn into British Army intelligence. Lawrence locked in his legacy during the war as guerilla mastermind of the Arab Revolt. At the war’s end, now Colonel Lawrence returned to England, sought to influence the Paris peace talks on behalf of the Arabs–failing that, and deeply disillusioned, he spent his remaining years running from the spotlight. Finally, four months before his death, Lawrence retired to a small cottage in Southern England, to wonder, as many of us to at such junctures, What next?

          But here I am in 1962, and for me Thomas Edward Lawrence is a movie. Not expecting the life affirming discovery I would make, I read everything I can find of T.E. Lawrence’s, chief being his massive, magnificent war memoir Seven Pillars of Wisdom; also, his thousands upon thousands of letters—letters to such notables as Winston Churchill, Edward Elgar, E.M. Forster, Robert Graves, Ezra Pound, and George Bernard Shaw. My discovery, sometimes on the surface of Lawrence’s writing but more often between the lines, was that this man Lawrence—Lawrence of Arabia, warrior, author, scholar–was a deeply conflicted man, almost certainly over his sexuality, and possibly, if you comb carefully enough, over questions of gender. I sat in my bedroom in The Bronx reading this stuff and thought, Holy shit, this is me!

            At that time I was at a point familiar to many of us—sensing a difference in me, fearing that difference made me a lesser person, somehow sure I couldn’t talk to others about my difference, and resigned to living a life of reduced accomplishment because of this difference. But here was Lawrence of Arabia . . .

          Was Lawrence homosexual? (I’ll use “homosexual.” It seems more fitting for an Edwardian man.) No one knows for sure. In certain of his letters, Lawrence denied any sexual experience. Yet he was certainly (what we would call today) gay-friendly. Among his closest friends were men like E.M. Forster. Cited often is a suspicious friendship with a teenage Arab boy when Lawrence was a twenty-something archaeologist. The boy, Selim Ahmed—initials S.A.—is possibly the person to whom Lawrence dedicated Seven Pillars of Wisdom, with its introductory poem, S.A., which opens: I loved you, so I drew these tides of men into my hands/and wrote my will across the sky in stars. In Seven Pillars Lawrence, seeing the intimacy enjoyed by some of his young fighters, tells us here is “the openness and honesty of perfect love.” In another chapter he describes “friends quivering together in the yielding sand with intimate hot limbs in supreme embrace.” (There were few such “intimate hot limbs in supreme embrace” in David Lean’s movie.) Then, too, in a letter to George Bernard Shaw’s wife, Lawrence wrote “I’ve seen lots of man-and-man loves: very lovely and fortunate some of them were.”

          Can you imagine what effect this sort of thing had on closeted me? No one—me included—can say with certainty that T.E. Lawrence was homosexual. But for me, reading his man’s books and letters in my Bronx bedroom all those many years ago, T.E. Lawrence was homosexual enough, enough for me to open my own closet door. My God, I thought, here’s a man troubled as I’m troubled, and he’s written his will across the sky in stars!

           I will regret, though, Lawrence himself never got out of his own closet. This, for me, remains a note of sustained sadness. Having retreated to his cottage—alone—Lawrence wrote to a friend—and I have often felt this to be one of the most melancholy snapshots of a life not fully realized—Lawrence wrote: “I’m sitting in my cottage rather puzzled to find out what has happened to me. At present the feeling is mere bewilderment. I imagine leaves must feel like this after they have fallen yet alive from their tree, now on the ground, looking up, and until they die, wondering.”

          A week later Lawrence, in a motorcycle crash, suffered fatal head injuries. He died six days later, never having recovered consciousness. He was 46. Lawrence was buried in a country cemetery not far from his cottage. A.W. Lawrence, his youngest brother, my correspondent, was the senior pallbearer.

_______

          Fifty-six years later, in February of 1990, I meet A.W. Lawrence face-to-face for the first time. The meeting was arranged by a mutual acquaintance. I am at Lawrence’s bedside. He’s 90 years of age. We reminisce about our lifetime correspondence. I show A.W. the aerogram he sent in 1959. He reads it very, very slowly, and at the end says, “Well, quite a good letter, that.”

          I leave with a promise to return in the summer. But I return home one day in April to my Capitol Hill apartment to find on my answering machine a message from our mutual acquaintance: “We’ve lost our dear friend, Ray. A.W. passed quietly last Sunday. That’s it then, Ray, isn’t it, the end of an era.”

          I telephoned the acquaintance to hear him say that my friendship with A.W. Lawrence—a friendship that was founded on A.W. himself and not on his famous brother—my friendship, particularly in his last years, had given back to A.W. his own identity.

______

          Although I consider myself successfully un-closeted, there does remain a pocket of silence, one that will always be there—

          What I was never able to say to A.W. Lawrence in 31 years was how grateful I was to his older brother—how this older brother, T.E. Lawrence, who had written his name “across the sky in stars” but who seems never to have made peace with his identity—how this older brother had managed to give a boy in the Bronx the gift of his own identity.

______

          A footnote in closing:

          If Lawrence of Arabia helped me out of the closet, and I considered myself fully out (the exception being the one pocket of silence I just mentioned), why then have I contributed my stories to our website under the name Colin Dale? Why not under my own name? Believe me, this is not another pocket of silence. Twenty-some years ago I and a friend were riding the London underground. We got off at a station stop called Colindale. Colindale: one word, no space. My friend said, “That’s not too shabby a name, Colindale. It would make a good alter-ego.” And so ever since if I write something that I send to my friend, I write it as Colin Dale: two words.

          If you were to look at a map of the London underground, you’d see that if my friend and I had gotten off one stop sooner, today I’d be Hendon Central. One stop later, I’d be Burnt Oak.

About the Author

Colin Dale couldn’t be happier to be involved again at the Center. Nearly three decades ago, Colin was both a volunteer and board member with the old Gay and Lesbian Community Center. Then and since he has been an actor and director in Colorado regional theatre. Old enough to report his many stage roles as “countless,” Colin lists among his favorite Sir Bonington in The Doctor’s Dilemma at Germinal Stage, George in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? and Colonel Kincaid in The Oldest Living Graduate, both at RiverTree Theatre, Ralph Nickleby in The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby with Compass Theatre, and most recently, Grandfather in Ragtime at the Arvada Center. For the past 17 years, Colin worked as an actor and administrator with Boulder’s Colorado Shakespeare Festival. Largely retired from acting, Colin has shifted his creative energies to writing–plays, travel, and memoir.