Bumper Stickers, by Betsy

So, why do people put stickers on their bumpers? The reasons probably vary from person to person. In my opinion most do it for identity reasons. They want the rest of the world to know who they are. Rather than putting a sticker on their chest or bum they put it on their bumper. After all, signs are specifically made for car bumpers and are readily available for purchase or for making a donation or showing support.

Another reason I think some people sport bumper stickers is that they think it will help to bring about that which they are promoting For example, the election of a particular candidate, or a more peaceful society (War is Not the Answer, Life is Short, Pray Hard, Close Guantanamo, better gun control, etc. ) You name it, there is a bumper sticker for just about any cause. But again, I think a cause soon becomes a part of one’s identity. And if you have a bumper sticker promoting your cause, you better stick with it because it ain’t comin’ off any time soon

Traveling in the northwest many years ago I saw this one: an image of an erupting volcano inside a circle with a line through it. I wondered who put this out. Could there be a movement starting dedicated to stopping volcanoes from erupting? Another one I saw in our travels also on the west coast somewhere. This one is even better than the one that addresses the volcano problem: STOP PLATE TECTONICS. That one was hysterical. I assume the people driving those vehicles want to be funny. I don’t suppose they actually think they can stop……..hmmm, I wonder. No, surely they don’t think they can…………….?? Now wouldn’t that be the ultimate in arrogance. I think they just have a good sense of humor.

Personally, I don’t like bumper stickers because they are impossible to take off the bumper once you put it on. There are solvents that will take off the residual adhesive. The down side is they also remove the paint. So I think twice before sticking the thing on there. One day you feel strongly about a cause. The next day you change your mind about whatever you are promoting. Or let’s say you want to change your image. It’s very hard to get rid of the old labels be they in people’s minds and perceptions or on your bumper. I would like some of the adhesive that is used to stick on bumper stickers; that is, I would like to have a supply of it at home. It’s stronger and longer lasting than super glue.

I guess the lesson of the bumper sticker is: be sure who you want to be or at least who you want to appear to be before you take on a label.

© 5 Jan 2015

About the Author

Betsy has been active in the GLBT community including PFLAG, the Denver Women’s Chorus, OLOC (Old Lesbians Organizing for Change), and the GLBT Community Center. She has been retired from the human services field for 20 years. Since her retirement, her major activities have included tennis, camping, traveling, teaching skiing as a volunteer instructor with the National Sports Center for the Disabled, reading, writing, and learning. Betsy came out as a lesbian after 25 years of marriage. She has a close relationship with her three children and four grandchildren. Betsy says her greatest and most meaningful enjoyment comes from sharing her life with her partner of 30 years, Gillian Edwards.

Misshapppen Identities, by Ricky

Many people relate to gay men via stereotypes and pejoratives. Among those epithets are the words “twisted,” “bent,” “weird,” “queer,” “pervert,” “homo,” and so forth. Straight males relate to lesbian women mostly using the words “hot” or “I want to see some action;” a typical male double standard. I don’t know much about the type of problems lesbians face in the post WW2 world except from what the female members of our story group have revealed. However, I do know what damage those pejoratives did to me and other gay boys, teens, and young men.

Called by those names and bullied, some boys, teens, and young men chose to end their lives rather than continue living with the abuse and hopelessness. Unloving parents threw others out of their homes but they survived into adulthood only to face abuse by other adults who did not love or provide them with security. HIV and AIDS claimed many who escaped or lived through the bad times.

I consider myself fortunate. I was very naïve about same sex attraction and its portent for my future. Like many gay adolescents, I was confused as to why I was not interested in girls as puberty began. All my friends were finding girls very desirable. I desired to play sex games with boys more than girls.

My home life was not idyllic but neither was it oppressive. My parents were simply not around most of the time. We never talked about sex at my home although my mother and I exchanged “dirty” jokes once. (Her’s was funnier.) I did not act gay. I like to play sports for fun and not just to win at all costs. In high school, I mostly hung out with two smart friends and I was the oldest boy in my scout troop. I even wore my scout uniform to school one day of each Scout Week while in high school. Nonetheless, no one ever teased me or called me any gay related pejoratives.

My mother must have either known or suspected I was gay. I never brought up the subject of girls or spoke of dating a girl or taking a girl to a school dance. I did have bi-weekly sleep-overs with one or two of my neighborhood peers. I believe she suspected me because twice, without my knowledge or permission, she “arranged” for me to take the daughters of some family friends to school dances I was not planning on attending. Another reason I think she suspected is because she was so surprised when she received our wedding announcement six years after I graduated from high school. The point of all this is that I survived into adulthood and even survived marriage.

However, I did not survive without emotional and mental scars. Very few people survive unscathed from growing up closeted knowingly or unknowingly. At the time, no gay could serve openly in the military. I served 16-years, 9-months, and 11-days while closeted. The stress of exposure within marriage or military service takes a toll on one’s psyche. Whether in the military or not, whether married or not, projecting a false identity warps a person’s real identity into something unnatural. It is like forcing a square peg into a round hole or damming and diverting a river into a constricting canal.

The only way to insert a square peg smoothly into a round hole is to trim the corners of the peg. This can be done with care and concern using something like sandpaper or it can be forcibly hammered. Either method damages the peg and/or the hole alike. While damming a river and forcing it into a new channel or canal can bring benefits, when the levy or canal overflows or breaks, havoc results. It is the same with people. When a person forced to bend or squeeze their identity into someone else’s mold or lock-box, confusion, resentment, anger, death, or a broken “spirit,” can occur. Even one of the foregoing conditions could result in a broken person.

People allowed to have their real identity publicly on display without ridicule, will grow, undamaged, and flower into the person they were born to become.

© 23 February 2013

About the Author

I was born in June of 1948 in Los Angeles, living first in Lawndale and then in Redondo Beach. Just prior to turning 8 years old in 1956, I began living with my grandparents on their farm in Isanti County, Minnesota for two years during which time my parents divorced.

When united with my mother and stepfather two years later in 1958, I lived first at Emerald Bay and then at South Lake Tahoe, California, graduating from South Tahoe High School in 1966. After three tours of duty with the Air Force, I moved to Denver, Colorado where I lived with my wife and four children until her passing away from complications of breast cancer four days after the 9-11 terrorist attack.

I came out as a gay man in the summer of 2010. I find writing these memories to be therapeutic.

My story blog is TheTahoeBoy.Blogspot.com

Queer, Just How Queer by Betsy

Imagine that we could measure an individual’s degree of sexual orientation by taking, say, a blood test. This would be an ugly world indeed with a rigid caste system. The most heterosexual would be on top and the most homosexual on the bottom.

Newborns would be immediately tested at birth. Here’s one scenario.

“Congratulations, Mr. and Mrs. Jones. You have a healthy baby boy measuring only two on the “queerometer” He will be your pride and joy.

Or the dreaded scenario:

“You have a healthy baby boy, Mr. and Mrs. Jones. He has 10 fingers and 10 toes and all his parts. I’m sorry to tell you that he tests positive on the queerometer. He’s a 9.6”

“Oh, says Mrs. Jones, gasping for breath. A 9.6 ! Does that mean, does that mean? “

“Yes, I’m afraid so,” says the attendant. At the age of eight years you will be required to turn him over to the Department of Corrections. He will be yours until then. Enjoy!”

Or the following close-call:

“Congratulations, Mr. and Mrs. Jones. You have a beautiful baby girl. She appears to be in perfect health and all her parts are in the right place.” However, she does measure a five on the queerometer, which, as you know, is high. The state will provide you with all the materials you need to guide her in the right direction. If you use the manual wisely and stick to it, she will turn out just fine and I’m sure she will live a normal life and give you many grandchildren.”

Or imagine a world in which LGBT people took on a particular hue at puberty. Say, a shade of purple. The really dark purple ones would be the really, really, queer ones, and the light violets would be only slightly inclined to be homosexual or transgender, or bisexual, or queer. I can see the pride parade right now. A massive multi-shaded purple blob oozing down Colfax.

Parents who suspected queerness would dread the day puberty started for their child. Of course, in this world everyone starts out with lily white skin. So the outward signs of race and ethnicity would not exist. In this world their would be no race and ethnicity. Only sexual orientation has meaning.

Of course, in the real world there is no such thing as a queerometer or purple-skinned LGBT’s. The world we know is so very much more complex than that.

In our world we have a choice. Not a choice of whether or not to be queer, but rather we choose to be in or out of the closet, we can choose to accept or deny our queerness, we choose our behaviors every minute of every day. A great raising of awareness over the last few decades has given us even more choices. At least, this is true for the most part in this community that we know so well and in most cities of this country. As acceptance becomes more and more prevalent I am very thankful, indeed. I am thankful everyday, that I have been free to choose to live my queerness with honesty and integrity and pride.

About the Author

Betsy has been active in the GLBT community including PFLAG, the Denver women’s chorus, OLOC (Old Lesbians Organizing for Change). She has been retired from the Human Services field for about 15 years. Since her retirement, her major activities include tennis, camping, traveling, teaching skiing as a volunteer instructor with National Sports Center for the Disabled, and learning. Betsy came out as a lesbian after 25 years of marriage. She has a close relationship with her three children and enjoys spending time with her four grandchildren. Betsy says her greatest and most meaningful enjoyment comes from sharing her life with her partner of 25 years, Gillian Edwards.

Mistaken Identity by Ray S

On an October day some years ago a second son was born to Ethel and Homer. They say he was almost ten pounds which seems like quite a lot for the slight mother. She later used to tell the story about dancing at parties when she was in her 8 1/2 month and how observers wondered how such a little woman with such a huge belly could keep up the Charleston dance step. Seems as though everything came out alright, no pun intended.

The new member of the family thrived on the love and attention from Mom and Dad. The older brother adjusted to the baby’s intrusion on his one-time monopoly of fair-haired first born (seven years difference) Apple of Everyone’s Eye. The seed of sibling rivalry was beginning to germinate but then manifested into an attitude of seeming denial of the little brother’s existence. If necessary the obligatory special occasions would be observed; that is, birthdays, Christmas, and Easter, etc. This pattern persisted into old age.

Early childhood revealed the physical differences between him and the girl next door.

The father’s dutiful instruction on the care and hygiene of the foreskin. How to pee standing up to the toilet. All quite SOP for his age.

Then some matters developed interesting turns. For instance, no one, least of all the child, thought there was anything odd that he had his own Patsy-Ann doll with a doll-sized truck full of little dresses lovingly sewn and/or knitted by mother. An actual talent for painting and drawing came along with a fascination for paper dolls. As time past he couldn’t manage to catch a ball much less win at kick-the-can or sports in general. The end result being a lifelong disinterest in sports or anything competitive.

One day after an exploratory adventure with two neighbor brothers he discovered you could do lots more with certain body parts besides eliminate one’s waste. And it was good!

As he developed emotionally as well as physically way in the back of his mind he became aware of being different.

He, through self awareness, ridicule, bullying, and abuse from older peers questioned his proscribed identity, and this happened before he even knew the words describing one’s sexuality. Ultimately with a contraband copy of Dr. Kinsey’s Report the revelation of twenty some years of mistaken Identity came home to roost. And the struggle went on until the day that the door fell off the hinges of the closet where he and so many other aged fairies resided. The mistake was theirs.

About the Author

Wisdom of GLBT Identity by Ray S

     There is something intoxicating and dangerous about the forbidden. That has always been my pervading attitude while spending a lifetime in the confines of my padded cell closet of denial. That is until the closet door would squeak open just enough to allow a taste of the forbidden fruit (no pun intended) of gay indulgence.

     As far as wisdom and identity go I am reminded of a recent opportunity I had to hear a presentation by noted author and gay sex counselor Dan Savage in response to a note card from the audience which stated quite candidly, “I don’t want to be gay.” There was a vocal gasp from those in the entire auditorium. It was truly amazing, but with great aplomb Savage proceeded to elaborate on how it is a long process to accept the gay identity, especially when a person young or older is struggling with the social and sexual conflicts of homosexuality in American society.

     Here is the knowledge; that is, knowledge offered. First study and read and talk about the subject. Then, learn that it is not a learned trait, but a natural phenomenon within the development of the fetus. If one can get this far he will slowly begin to accept the reality. As he said about a number of sexual processes–”take it slowly.”

     After this step of learning and wisdom comes experience, understanding who you are, and being comfortable with being “different” especially when you learn you are not alone. This process can be very lengthy and some of us have difficulty slamming that closet door shut.

     In our growing up years there is a natural emphasis on our developing sexuality–in both the straight and gay worlds. With experience most of us discover that there are great rewards in the knowledge that homosexual relationships are much more than physical lust and needs.

     The wonder and beauty of our deep and abiding love for our chosen special person is universal in both worlds. This reads very idealistic and not always easily attainable, but certainly a rewarding goal to be strived for.

     This to me is the wonderful revelation of LGBT identity.

Closet Case by Micahel King

          Denial can be unconscious and costumed in so many different and creative ways. I look back on at least sixty some years of telling myself who I am, what I think, what I believe, how I feel, what I want, and an infinite number other adaptations to identity. Now of course I am the same me that I have always been and will always be, but my self-concept and my attachment to definitions of selfhood have run the full spectrum and back again. Wow, isn’t it fascinating what the ego can come up with? And when in full defensive mode the distortions or imaginative propaganda that we try to kid ourselves with is downright funny and occasionally quite sad.

          Many of the costumes I have worn over the years are still hanging in the back while all the newer ego outfits are easier to put on or take off. These identity outfits include those I will gladly wear to most any occasion while others I reserve for those special occasions when I want to appear in a particular way. Of course if you’re like me you will have a huge wardrobe. That’s fine. It gives us the ability to be interesting and have character. The trick over a lifetime is to have an assortment of clean, neatly pressed and just plain honest, up front outfits that cover most any situation in a somewhat suitable way.

          Now that I can wear my outlandish ear adornments with bright colorful paisley shirts and unusual patterned and multicolor sweaters that when in combination tells the world that I am a somewhat eccentric, flaming queer with no second thoughts.

          O.K. I will be fair. There was a time when I was just as flamboyant but tried to pretend that since I was a father and had girlfriends that no one would suspect my innermost desires. Well not too long ago when I finally had my first boyfriend I told my daughters. They all said that they had known since they were young. So why did I keep so many of my most interesting outfits hanging there, practically unused for all these years? I admit that I have either thrown out or given to charity (that’s a line of bull, isn’t it) many of the adornments and outfits that no longer fit. I still have more possible looks than most people I know. I do drag and had lots of fun with my grandson, daughter and son-in-law being catered to by my lover in the audience. I’ve come a long way, baby! Most of the time my closet door is wide open. It really isn’t my style to think of myself as having been a closet case. I may have been able to keep my job, get promotions, have the friends that I avoided, etc., but at the time I wasn’t feeling that I could be the me that wears whatever I want and not try to cover anything up. Since I do need a warm coat in the winter, I try to make sure I have the right color of fuchsia scarf to clash with my red coat and Tibetan bead earbobs over the purple paisley shirt and computer knitted multicolor sweater with purple socks to match. Why did it take most of a lifespan to be and do what I feel most comfortable with and that is as honest as my ego will let me be. I do think my ego is having a hell of a lot more fun now that there is no need for defenses. I often get complements on my many outfits.

About the Author

I go by the drag name, Queen Anne Tique. My real name is
Michael King. I am a gay activist who finally came out of the closet at age 70.
I live with my lover, Merlyn, in downtown Denver, Colorado. I was married
twice, have 3 daughters, 4 grandchildren and a great grandson. Besides
volunteering at the GLBT Center and doing the SAGE activities,” Telling
your Story”,” Men’s Coffee” and the “Open Art Studio”.
I am active in Prime Timers and Front Rangers. I now get to do many of the
activities that I had hoped to do when I retired; traveling, writing, painting,
doing sculpture, cooking and drag.

Cooking by Colin Dale

          As a kid, cooking terrified me, and I wasn’t a kid who terrified easily. It wasn’t the doing of cooking so much that terrified me, but the idea of cooking. The idea of cooking scared not the crap out of me but the identity out of me.

          You know how with many languages–actually with one fourth of the world’s languages–there’s such a thing as grammatical gender? In these languages, all objects–not just those with obvious biological gender such as men and women, bulls and cows, but all objects–are classified by gender. That’s why, in a language like Spanish for example, we have not only ‘el hombre,’ masculine for ‘the man,’ and ‘la mujer,’ feminine for ‘the woman;’ but also ‘el machete,’ masculine for ‘the machete, or big knife,’ and ‘la mesa,’ feminine for the table. Languages using grammatical gender most often use only two: masculine and feminine; a few, like German, also employ neuter. English doesn’t mess around with grammatical gender. We English-speakers don’t bother classifying all objects according to masculine, feminine, or neuter. That’s why first time language learners studying certain foreign languages often find the business of grammatical gender completely crazymaking.

          But grammatical gender is a matter of language and therefore a terror only for language learners. The idea of cooking, when I was growing up, presented a different kind of terror for me, not a language terror but a terror linked more vitally to biological gender: let’s call it self-conscious gender.

          I should say in calling it self-conscious I’m not suggesting a condition of shyness or awkwardness–although, in my case, shyness and awkwardness were certainly both there to be seen. I’m thinking more of self-conscious in the sense of how one sees oneself, how one takes the measure of oneself. So, when I say, as a kid, I was terrorized by self-conscious gender, what I’m saying is that biological gender, as well as the socially approved sexual orientation linked to that gender–were much on my mind. Something I suspect we all experience: I didn’t know how to see myself. I didn’t know how to take the measure of myself.

          What, you should be asking, does all this have to do with cooking?

          In my childhood, much as in Spanish, all objects were classified by gender. For example, sports–baseball, football; not necessarily tennis–were like ‘el machete,’ the big knife: masculine. Household chores, like cleaning and cooking, were like ‘la mesa,’ the table: feminine. I’ve suggested first time foreign language learners often find grammatical gender completely crazymaking. Well, believe me, for a kid growing up for the first time, self-conscious gender can be just as crazymaking.

          My family, my relatives, my schoolmates were all I had for a reference frame–as with studying a language, that Beginners’ Spanish textbook is all you have to go on. Within my reference frame, cleaning and cooking weren’t the only things classified as feminine. The list was a long one. It included fussiness about clothes–feminine, too much time spent grooming–feminine, a fear of getting dirty–feminine–although gardening, which was bound to get you dirty, was definitely feminine–feminine too was avoiding bullies, or showing an interest in the arts–music, dance, or poetry–and absolutely feminine was taking pleasure in the outdoors, not, of course, as a place to play touch football–that was masculine–but the outdoors for itself, for the grasses, the trees, the birds and changes of season. All of these were dangerously feminine.

          Puzzling to me was seeing a few of my schoolmates take up some of these feminine interests–something I hadn’t the guts to do. I had schoolmates who drifted into the arts. Others who seemed to enjoy dressing nicely. A few who weren’t particularly aggressive. It wasn’t until years later that I figured out these schoolmates could make the choices they made because they weren’t terrorized by self-conscious gender. These schoolmates, the ones painting pictures, playing piano, reading books–some even cooking–from an early age, these schoolmates were able to take the measure of themselves, to see themselves–and to be comfortable with what they saw.

          I have spent so much of my life looking over my shoulder, not only in my childhood but also deep into my adulthood. In fact, there are still moments when I take a quick glance. What am I looking out for? I’m looking out for–what shall I call him?–the Accuser. The Accuser, should he show up, will point and say–loudly so all can hear–‘Aha, I’ve found you out! Now we can all see what you are. There’s no pretending any more.’

          I knew as a child–even as a teenager–if I should so much as show the slightest interest in one of these feminine behaviors–going on a nature hike, writing a poem, avoiding a bully–learning to cook–the door would fly open and there would be The Accuser, pointing and saying loud enough so that all might hear–my parents, my aunts and uncles, my teachers, my schoolmates–‘Aha, I’ve found you out! Now we can all see what you are. You’re a faggot. Or, worse yet, maybe even a girl. There’s no pretending any more.’

          And so I overcompensated. I lived a super masculine life–deliberately–although not necessarily because I wanted to. I stayed away from boys who–as my parents might say–were ‘that way.’ Although I fled playing team sports and instead hid in my room reading books, I was always very careful to make light of my reading and to show a great interest–entirely fake–in spectator sports. For effect, I smoked a pipe, although you’d never catch me in a suit and tie. When the opportunity came along–although I was secretly trying to dodge military service–I elected a regular, as opposed to reserve, commission (i.e., more manly), opted for a combat arm, and deported myself reasonably well in Korea and Vietnam.

          Self-conscious gender made me, you might say, what I was never meant to be: a warrior–albeit a reluctant warrior.

          So, where does this leave me? It leaves me right here. Sixty-seven years old. I’m happy. I live a good life. I do go on nature hikes, although don’t ask me to identify a bird. Sports? Well, I do get together with friends to watch the Broncos, but I do it mostly for the pizza and the conversation. I’m an avid reader; I don’t make light of it; I’m proud of it. And some of it’s poetry. As for suits and ties? Well, I’m a jeans guy. Although I know it makes absolutely no sense, there’s still this leftover voice whispering in my head: suits and ties are for men that are “that way.”

            What about cooking? I still don’t. Or so rarely it hardly counts. If I do cook, it’s only to give the Accuser one more shot. It’s to give him a chance to come into my kitchen and say, ‘Aha, there you are, trying to cook! You’re not a cook. The whole world knows. There’s no pretending any more.’

About the Author

Colin Dale couldn’t be happier to be involved again at the Center. Nearly three decades ago, Colin was both a volunteer and board member with the old Gay and Lesbian Community Center. Then and since he has been an actor and director in Colorado regional theatre. Old enough to report his many stage roles as “countless,” Colin lists among his favorite Sir Bonington in The Doctor’s Dilemma at Germinal Stage, George in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? and Colonel Kincaid in The Oldest Living Graduate, both at RiverTree Theatre, Ralph Nickleby in The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby with Compass Theatre, and most recently, Grandfather in Ragtime at the Arvada Center. For the past 17 years, Colin worked as an actor and administrator with Boulder’s Colorado Shakespeare Festival. Largely retired from acting, Colin has shifted his creative energies to writing–plays, travel, and memoir.

Going Pink by Michael King

Oh, the glow of a sunset’s reflection on the snow. The blush of being caught with your pants down, the frills of a little girl dressed up in pink. Boys don’t wear pink is sort of an old rule. There was the pink triangle and the gas chambers for gays of the 40s in Germany. Yet in the 50s it was OK to wear the pink and gray shirt and occasionally see a pink and gray car drive by. But it seems that pink was mostly related to expensive stucco hotels, the color for little girls and bigger girls too, prom dresses, weddings, etc., and for gay men. Though I haven’t seen many gay men dressed in pink, the walk-in cooler in the flower shop was pink because the fairy co-owner expressed his gay status in that way. It was an unmistakable statement. So upon my new identity I fantasized my statements.  Red is more my color, but I want at least a touch of all clear, clean colors in my surroundings.

When it was a fact that the “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” was officially rescinded, I wanted to make a statement. As a veteran, I wanted to fulfill one of my fantasies. Quite by an unplanned circumstance I saw a pink wig at a thrift store. Immediately I knew what I wanted to do with it. Thus began a shopping spree to find all the rest of my fantasy. Both of my lovers were very supportive. Since one was working and had family responsibilities most of the search for my debut attire was with Merlyn, who soon became comfortable going into the ladies’ stores, watching my try on items, or the vintage shops, the lingerie departments and costume shops. I looked all over for glasses and then created a wire and jeweled extension to the frame of a pair of reading glasses that I accented with pink nail polish. The rhinestone earrings came from an antique mall.
Then came the big day; or night really. Escorted by my two lovers, both dressed in black, Queen Ann Tique, a name given to me by John Kelly, arrived at Charlie’s for the repeal celebration.
 I had been interviewed by Channel 4 when the vote passed and was introduced as a gay activist. From that point on my new mission has been to flaunt my gayness and now the grand entrance and celebration. Having been born a king, at 71 I was now a queen, a queen in pink.
By Christmas, I was able to add to the pink thing. I had another fantasy. In deciding to decorate for the holidays, I dragged out the decorations from storage and discovered that since it had been years since they had been used, the tree was missing. I must have gotten rid of it when I last moved, so, now to find that perfect tree. Merlyn and I were in an antique store that we frequent when we were greeted by one of the dealers with open arms stating, “Whatever you want we have.” My response was that I wanted a pink feather Christmas tree. Her eyes got large, her mouth opened and the shocked look on her face preceded the statement, “How did you know? We just got one in two hours ago!”
Again we got to go shopping for decorations. We found  a pair of fucia glittered deer, a clashing big pink bow, balls and garland and topped it off with what we thought gay guys should put on top of their pink feather Christmas tree; a fairy of course.
My next pink thing hasn’t been thought of yet, but I do have the rest of eternity to be pretty in pink or whatever.

About the Author

I go by the drag name, Queen Anne Tique. My real name is Michael King. I am a gay activist who finally came out of the closet at age 70. I live with my lover, Merlyn, in downtown Denver, Colorado. I was married twice, have 3 daughters, 4 grandchildren and a great grandson. Besides volunteering at the GLBT Center and doing the SAGE activities–“Telling your Story”,” Men’s Coffee” and the “Open Art Studio”– I am active in Prime Timers and Front Rangers. I now get to do many of the activities that I had hoped to do when I retired; traveling, writing, painting, doing sculpture, cooking and drag.

What Do I Call Myself? by Donny Kaye

          I’ve noticed a bumper sticker on the back of a friend’s car that reads, “I Am”.

      I am!

      I am?

      Immediately I realize that I begin to search for a label that names what I Am. I am a man. I am a son. In my search for the label that seems to fit at the moment, I begin to realize that to label me something requires a judgment. I am this and in being this, I am not that. It gets confusing. It can become disabling. It can seem unfair at times. It, what it is that is being used as the label, can be empowering, neutral or even the source of shame. Whatever it is that I call myself is the result of judgments that I have been taught. Judgments that are reflective of my culture.

      The culture that we get born into begins to differentiate and separate us at its earliest of opportunities. Immediately we are given a name. When I was born, I was placed in a blue blanket differentiating me almost immediately as the result of the judgment of another. (Trust me, I might not have chosen blue.) It seems that as soon as words began to be associated with defining me, words which were reliant on the judgments of others, I began to see myself separately and became conditioned to the language that was being associated with me for my definition of my own self. The labels started early. After all, if it weren’t for labeling, Margaret and Douglas might have taken another baby home from the hospital. Then, where would I be?

      As soon as culture has its way, there seems to be only more definition and separation that occurs with the labeling. So in my case, my differentiation ‘boy’—I am boy—took on more modifiers like ‘good boy’ and with that judgment, ‘bad boy’. Nice boy. Cute boy. Naughty boy. Guilty boy. And at some point in my formation, I made agreement with some of the labels that were being used to differentiate me. In my mind, in the language I used about myself, I began to accept that I am one way or another. As a result of the culture I got born into, there were some definitions about me that stuck. Some have been positive. Some, negative. Positive, negative or in between, they have all come to serve me.

      At some point in my life journey I began to be confused by the labels that had been used to differentiate me, recognizing that many of the labels just didn’t fit–or at least they didn’t seem to fit any longer. Who am I?

      Psychologists have researched and written about the principles of becoming autonomous for centuries. Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, was one of the first psychologists at the end of the Eighteenth Century to study these principles.

      Autonomous refers to one who gives oneself their own law-not a law based on another’s thinking, but the thinking that is unique to the individual. Autonomy refers to the capacity of a rational individual to make an informed, un-coerced decision, in this case, about the self. Not influenced by others; but an un-coerced decision about the self. Most psychologists agree that this process of becoming autonomous begins to unfold in the psyche during adolescence. What is interesting for me to realize is that some of the agreements I made about who I am have taken a life time to uncover. Could it be that adolescence actually continues into the sixth and seventh decades of life? Maybe!

      So, here I am. (It’s those two words again, I AM)

      I exist in a culture that is reliant on labels, requiring that everything be languaged in some way. At different times I call myself different things depending on the situation. In different settings, I act and exist with different labels that I assign to myself. Sometimes the label that I give to myself can be harsh and negative. At other times, not. Always it seems, the label I assign to myself is never comprehensive enough to describe the whole of me. These labels I give to myself can end up sounding like background information you might be reading about me in a personal add on one of the social websites. You know what I mean, GWM, cut. Top/bottom or verse. Sensitive. Creative. And the labeling goes on-and-on, attempting to define for myself and others my presence based on what I do.

      Beyond the labels that I assign to myself is the dynamic that gets set up when others label me, based on how they need me to be. At one time I thought it most critical what others thought of me. Now I’m more inclined to rest in the idea that it’s really none of my business what you think of me; unless, of course, it interferes with my safety and my right to happiness. I’ll never forget walking down Colfax in front of the Cathedral and the group of protesters shouting at me “Faggot,” “You’re going to hell,” and the malicious protests continued. Once I realized the taunting was directed at me, I stepped into the space of one of the loudest and looking him in the eye, invited him to “make it a great day and go create some fun in his life.”

      To this very moment, I don’t know what it was that started the enraged shouting at me other than location, and that it was PRIDE weekend. I wasn’t in drag. There were no messages on my shirt. I hadn’t put on any beads yet. What can I say? They just needed me to be their faggot. The one they could spew on with their hateful message and judgment.

      What do I call myself? It does come down to judgment. As soon as something is judged, there is a dynamic or quality that gets set up that requires looking at the label on a spectrum. The spectrum exists with extremes on either end. Someplace along that continuum is me in that one regard. So, I take an attribute like SENSITIVE. To understand sensitive, I have to know IN-SENSITIVE. Or CARING. To know CARING I have to put it along side my experience of UN-CARING. The judgments can only exist in the understanding of the opposites. So for the guy yelling “FAGGOT” he is basing that on his understanding of NON FAGGOT or in his mind, extreme hetero. I’m also reminded in this case of the childhood lesson of “it takes one to know one.” But, that aside; what do I call myself?

      Once all of the labels and the required judgments are set aside, there is the quality of experience within me of just being me. I JUST AM. (The bumper sticker’s message.)

      I AM. Beyond words. Beyond definition required by opposites. I AM. The experience of infinite possibility. No limitations. Just me. And what I realize is that when I can allow for the experience of I Am, I recognize an incredible connection, and a oneness with you. With everything. I AM.

About the Author

Donny Kaye-Is a native born Denverite. He has lived his life posing as a hetero-sexual male, while always knowing that his sexual orientation was that of a gay male. In recent years he has confronted the pressures of society that forced him into deep denial regarding his sexuality and an experience of living somewhat of a disintegrated life. “I never forgot for a minute that I was what my childhood friends mocked, what I thought my parents would reject and what my loving God supposedly condemned to limitless suffering.” StoryTime at The Center has been essential to assisting him with not only telling the stories of his childhood, adolescence and adulthood but also to merely recall the stories of his past that were covered with lies and repressed in to the deepest corners of his memory. Within the past two years he has “come out” not only to himself but to his wife of four decades, his three children, their partners and countless extended family and friends. Donny is divorced and yet remains closely connected with his family. He lives in the Capitol Hill Community of Denver, in integrity with himself and in a way that has resulted in an experience of more fully realizing integration within his life experiences. He participates in many functions of the GLBTQ community.

Closet Case by Colin Dale

          I was helped out of the closet by a man who died in 1935—ten years before I was born—a man who never successfully got out of his own closet. In other words, this man who helped me out of the closet lived and died a closet case.

          I’m going to begin, though, in telling you how, in 1959, I became acquainted not with the man who helped me out of the closet but with his surviving brother, under totally unrelated circumstances—

          It’s 1959. I am 14 years old. I’m living with my mother, father, and older brother in a second floor walk-up apartment in the East Bronx. I know you’ve heard me talk about my growing-up years in The Bronx a number of times before. It helps though to visualize my working-class surroundings in order to understand the improbability of a kid in the East Bronx making the acquaintance of an Oxford professor of archaeology. In my growing up years, fathers, like my father, were laborers. Mothers, like my mother, were housewives. Fathers disappeared each morning to their factory jobs on the elevated subway—the “el.” Mothers led kids like me to public school. They shopped. And they cooked. I say with complete kindness my father and mother were not very well educated. They had come through the Great Depression, and in all things did the very best they could.

          I had an uncle though, a lion of a man, who, as a highly educated man, was an outlier in the family. He recognized in me a kindred bookworm. One day he delivered—to an apartment that could barely accommodate it—a 33-year-old set of the Britannica. The 1926 Britannica.

          Fourteen-year-old me wanted to be an archaeologist. I read in the Britannica every article I could find on archaeology. One article on Persian archaeology especially excited me. I decided to send the writer what today we would call a fan letter. The writer, the Britannica told me, was a “Arnold W. Lawrence, professor, Oxford.”

          I wrote my fan letter. In my innocence, I had addressed it to “Professor Arnold W. Lawrence, Oxford, England,” not knowing Oxford was a conglomerate of universities, and forgetting that the man who had written the article had written it more than three decades earlier.

          But months later I received a reply, from A.W. Lawrence, London. Professor Lawrence, 60, retired, was apparently stunned to get my fan letter. In 1926 for A.W. Lawrence, the Britannica article was an extraordinary credit. Professor Lawrence’s reply to my fan letter–a tissue-paper blue aerogram (which I have safely at home) was the beginning of a correspondence that lasted up and down, on and off for 31 years—although (and this is another story for another Monday), I met Professor Lawrence face-to-face only once, in 1990, two months before his death.

          Now, though, to bring the two brothers together—

          We move forward, from 1959 to 1962. I’m 17, studying architecture (so much for archaeology) at a vocational art school in Manhattan, and I’m corresponding every month or so from our second floor walk-up with this retired Oxford professor in London. And, I’m still closeted. A movie opens in Times Square, David Lean’s epic Lawrence of Arabia. I go to see it. I’m blown away. I never make the connection though—Lawrence and Lawrence—why should I? Lawrence is not an uncommon name. I want to learn more about Lawrence of Arabia. I stop in a midtown bookstore and I find a ratted copy of the Penguin The Essential T.E. Lawrence (that’s Lawrence of Arabia: Thomas Edward Lawrence). On the subway to the Bronx I pop the book and read in the sketch biography: “Thomas Edward Lawrence . . . five brothers . . . the youngest, Arnold Walter Lawrence.” Could this be? I think, this man I’ve been corresponding with for three years, could he be Lawrence of Arabia’s youngest brother? I write and ask, and of course he is.

          Thomas Edward Lawrence was born in 1888. His story is generally known, thanks to David Lean’s movie. Briefly: Lawrence studied at Oxford to be an archaeologist, went on a British Museum sponsored dig to the Middle East; at the onset of the First World War, he was drawn into British Army intelligence. Lawrence locked in his legacy during the war as guerilla mastermind of the Arab Revolt. At the war’s end, now Colonel Lawrence returned to England, sought to influence the Paris peace talks on behalf of the Arabs–failing that, and deeply disillusioned, he spent his remaining years running from the spotlight. Finally, four months before his death, Lawrence retired to a small cottage in Southern England, to wonder, as many of us to at such junctures, What next?

          But here I am in 1962, and for me Thomas Edward Lawrence is a movie. Not expecting the life affirming discovery I would make, I read everything I can find of T.E. Lawrence’s, chief being his massive, magnificent war memoir Seven Pillars of Wisdom; also, his thousands upon thousands of letters—letters to such notables as Winston Churchill, Edward Elgar, E.M. Forster, Robert Graves, Ezra Pound, and George Bernard Shaw. My discovery, sometimes on the surface of Lawrence’s writing but more often between the lines, was that this man Lawrence—Lawrence of Arabia, warrior, author, scholar–was a deeply conflicted man, almost certainly over his sexuality, and possibly, if you comb carefully enough, over questions of gender. I sat in my bedroom in The Bronx reading this stuff and thought, Holy shit, this is me!

            At that time I was at a point familiar to many of us—sensing a difference in me, fearing that difference made me a lesser person, somehow sure I couldn’t talk to others about my difference, and resigned to living a life of reduced accomplishment because of this difference. But here was Lawrence of Arabia . . .

          Was Lawrence homosexual? (I’ll use “homosexual.” It seems more fitting for an Edwardian man.) No one knows for sure. In certain of his letters, Lawrence denied any sexual experience. Yet he was certainly (what we would call today) gay-friendly. Among his closest friends were men like E.M. Forster. Cited often is a suspicious friendship with a teenage Arab boy when Lawrence was a twenty-something archaeologist. The boy, Selim Ahmed—initials S.A.—is possibly the person to whom Lawrence dedicated Seven Pillars of Wisdom, with its introductory poem, S.A., which opens: I loved you, so I drew these tides of men into my hands/and wrote my will across the sky in stars. In Seven Pillars Lawrence, seeing the intimacy enjoyed by some of his young fighters, tells us here is “the openness and honesty of perfect love.” In another chapter he describes “friends quivering together in the yielding sand with intimate hot limbs in supreme embrace.” (There were few such “intimate hot limbs in supreme embrace” in David Lean’s movie.) Then, too, in a letter to George Bernard Shaw’s wife, Lawrence wrote “I’ve seen lots of man-and-man loves: very lovely and fortunate some of them were.”

          Can you imagine what effect this sort of thing had on closeted me? No one—me included—can say with certainty that T.E. Lawrence was homosexual. But for me, reading his man’s books and letters in my Bronx bedroom all those many years ago, T.E. Lawrence was homosexual enough, enough for me to open my own closet door. My God, I thought, here’s a man troubled as I’m troubled, and he’s written his will across the sky in stars!

           I will regret, though, Lawrence himself never got out of his own closet. This, for me, remains a note of sustained sadness. Having retreated to his cottage—alone—Lawrence wrote to a friend—and I have often felt this to be one of the most melancholy snapshots of a life not fully realized—Lawrence wrote: “I’m sitting in my cottage rather puzzled to find out what has happened to me. At present the feeling is mere bewilderment. I imagine leaves must feel like this after they have fallen yet alive from their tree, now on the ground, looking up, and until they die, wondering.”

          A week later Lawrence, in a motorcycle crash, suffered fatal head injuries. He died six days later, never having recovered consciousness. He was 46. Lawrence was buried in a country cemetery not far from his cottage. A.W. Lawrence, his youngest brother, my correspondent, was the senior pallbearer.

_______

          Fifty-six years later, in February of 1990, I meet A.W. Lawrence face-to-face for the first time. The meeting was arranged by a mutual acquaintance. I am at Lawrence’s bedside. He’s 90 years of age. We reminisce about our lifetime correspondence. I show A.W. the aerogram he sent in 1959. He reads it very, very slowly, and at the end says, “Well, quite a good letter, that.”

          I leave with a promise to return in the summer. But I return home one day in April to my Capitol Hill apartment to find on my answering machine a message from our mutual acquaintance: “We’ve lost our dear friend, Ray. A.W. passed quietly last Sunday. That’s it then, Ray, isn’t it, the end of an era.”

          I telephoned the acquaintance to hear him say that my friendship with A.W. Lawrence—a friendship that was founded on A.W. himself and not on his famous brother—my friendship, particularly in his last years, had given back to A.W. his own identity.

______

          Although I consider myself successfully un-closeted, there does remain a pocket of silence, one that will always be there—

          What I was never able to say to A.W. Lawrence in 31 years was how grateful I was to his older brother—how this older brother, T.E. Lawrence, who had written his name “across the sky in stars” but who seems never to have made peace with his identity—how this older brother had managed to give a boy in the Bronx the gift of his own identity.

______

          A footnote in closing:

          If Lawrence of Arabia helped me out of the closet, and I considered myself fully out (the exception being the one pocket of silence I just mentioned), why then have I contributed my stories to our website under the name Colin Dale? Why not under my own name? Believe me, this is not another pocket of silence. Twenty-some years ago I and a friend were riding the London underground. We got off at a station stop called Colindale. Colindale: one word, no space. My friend said, “That’s not too shabby a name, Colindale. It would make a good alter-ego.” And so ever since if I write something that I send to my friend, I write it as Colin Dale: two words.

          If you were to look at a map of the London underground, you’d see that if my friend and I had gotten off one stop sooner, today I’d be Hendon Central. One stop later, I’d be Burnt Oak.

About the Author

Colin Dale couldn’t be happier to be involved again at the Center. Nearly three decades ago, Colin was both a volunteer and board member with the old Gay and Lesbian Community Center. Then and since he has been an actor and director in Colorado regional theatre. Old enough to report his many stage roles as “countless,” Colin lists among his favorite Sir Bonington in The Doctor’s Dilemma at Germinal Stage, George in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? and Colonel Kincaid in The Oldest Living Graduate, both at RiverTree Theatre, Ralph Nickleby in The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby with Compass Theatre, and most recently, Grandfather in Ragtime at the Arvada Center. For the past 17 years, Colin worked as an actor and administrator with Boulder’s Colorado Shakespeare Festival. Largely retired from acting, Colin has shifted his creative energies to writing–plays, travel, and memoir.